The outcomes in the analysis have to be sensed for the limitations out of testing. I made an effort to generate alot more players of the generating the study through several channels such as for instance private connectivity, Lgbt professional and you may pupil connectivity, on the internet Gay and lesbian teams, and you may social networking. Nonetheless, the latest recruitment off people try challenging and you can concluded having a sample away from seven. I believe that the newest try size of seven was small so you’re able to depict Korean bisexual anyone, although the part of Korean people whom identify since the Lgbt keeps never been surveyed and you can remains not familiar. Hence, the findings of the investigation should be considered exploratory and interpreted which have caution.
While doing so, the fresh test are biased regarding many years and you may marital reputation. Every members but one was in fact in their twenties, and only you to definitely participant is married, that may limit the transferability of the conclusions to help you a national take to. Instance, considering the average years initially marriage for dudes and you will feamales in Korea is actually their thirties, bisexual people within thirties otherwise elderly might imagine in regards to the court shelter and personal identification one to an effective heterosexual Eurooppa morsiamet relationship may have during the Korean society more those who work in its twenties. We think one a very diversified decide to try might have produced some other findings (especially in terms of decades and relationship position). Future research you can expect to highlight higher assortment and adequate dimensions in the test. Ultimately, the data just provided cisgender bisexuals as the we’re going to end generalizing this new findings in order to organizations that may provides some other event regarding those of cisgender bisexual teams. But not, coming knowledge is always to work on people who are transgender and you will bisexual to explore how gender term intersects having sexuality.
Research accessibility statement
The fresh datasets displayed in this post aren’t available because the professionals with the analysis didn’t give composed consent because of their study to get shared in public. Demands concerning your datasets will be brought with the associated publisher.
Ethics statement
Ethical opinion and you can recognition was not needed for the study on human professionals in accordance with the local laws and you will institutional requirements. The fresh new people/people offered its composed told accept be involved in this research.
Journalist contributions
JP formulated the research tip, assessed the information, grabbed the lead in writing the newest manuscript, and you will monitored the final manuscript. South carolina did investigation range, reviewed the info, and you will triggered creating the original manuscript. All the article writers led to the article and you can recognized the fresh recorded version.
Conflict of great interest
The new article authors point out that the study try presented in the absence of every commercial or financial matchmaking that might be construed as a possible argument interesting.
Publisher’s notice
All of the says indicated on this page is actually only those of the article writers plus don’t necessarily show those of its associated communities, or the ones from the latest blogger, brand new writers as well as the reviewers. People product that can be analyzed on this page, otherwise declare that are from its manufacturer, isn’t guaranteed otherwise supported because of the copywriter.
Acknowledgments
The brand new article authors desires to express its appreciation so you’re able to people getting its ample benefits to your studies, Namkoong Mi having their unique aid in this new interviews procedure, Hyojeong Yoon to own their unique contribution in the investigation research process, and finally Heeje Son to own their own appointment about this article.
Records
- Armstrong H. L., Reissing Elizabeth. D. (2014). Thinking into the informal sex, relationships, and you can enough time relationships with bisexual partners . J Bisexuality fourteen , 236–264. doi: 84 [CrossRef] [Bing Pupil]
- Balsam K. F., Mohr J. J. (2007). Type to sexual direction stigma: a comparison out of bisexual and you can lesbian/gay grownups . J. Couns. Psychol. 54 , 306–319. doi: -.step 3.306 [CrossRef] [Google Pupil]