A boardroom review allows a table a way to evaluate their performance in a holistic manner. It helps tables discover aspects of longevity, as and weaknesses in their leadership relationships, connections and culture that could result in changes in both the social and practical aspects. It helps ensure that those who pay to join a table are properly equipped to carry out their duties.
This research area is developing however there are several challenges. The current evidence-based evidence provides mixed results regarding how dissent affects boards and their functioning. While some studies report positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear results, others find negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019) and non-significant or mixed results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats, 2015; Minichilli et al. 2012) relationships between dissent and the board’s performance.
The literature does not offer an in-depth understanding of the factors that affect the dissension’s dynamics. Future research should provide an integrated theoretical framework to contextualize this governance phenomenon. This could involve the use of a configurational approach (Federo and Saz Carranza 2018; Schiell Lewellyn and Yan 2023) to assist researchers to more precisely understand how individual board https://www.boardroombook.com/5-effective-communication-skills-in-meetings/ attributes processes, contexts, and even processes connect to the need for and sufficient causality in governance processes.
Additionally, some studies employ an esoteric definition of dissent and do not disclose precise measurements. These studies are therefore prone to measurement errors. It would be worthwhile to develop more robust methods to measure dissent for future studies.